The Last Week: Chapter 3, Tuesday

Mark 11:20-25

Tuesday is the longest day in Mark’s story of Jesus’s final week.

  • About two-thirds of Tuesday consists of conflict with temple authorities
  • The remaining third warns of the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple and speaks of the coming of the Son of Man, all in the near future.

Jesus’s Authority Is Challenged

  • Mark 11:27-33
  • “They ask Jesus, ‘By what authority are you doing these things?’ The question refers to Jesus’s prophetic act in the temple on Monday, and Mark’s use of the plural ‘things’ suggests that Sunday’s provocative entry into the city may also be included.” (page 51)

Jesus Indicts The Authorities With A Parable

  • Mark 12:1-12
  • Jesus takes the initiative. Commonly called the parable of the wicked tenants, this story might better be called the parable of the greedy tenants.
  • “The motivation for their murderous behavior is greed: they want to possess the produce of the vineyard for themselves.” (page 52)
  • “Christian interpretation of this parable has most often emphasized a christological meaning.” but…
  • “The primary meaning of the parable is not christological. Rather as Mark tells us at the very end of the story, it is an indictment of the authorities.” (page 52)
  • “The tenants are not ‘Israel’ not ‘the Jews.’ Rather, the vineyard is Israel — both the land and its people. And the vineyard belongs to God, not to the greedy tenants — the powerful and wealthy at the top of the local domination system — who want its produce for themselves.” (page 53)

Taxes To Caesar?

  • Mark 12:13-17
  • “It has been most commonly understood to mean that there are two separate realms of human life, one religious and one political.” (page 54)
  • “The heavy weight given to this verse as a solemn pronouncement about the relationship between religion and politics obscures what it means in Mark.” (page 54)
  • “To imagine that their purpose is to provide a set of eternal truths about how human life should be ordered is to ignore the larger narrative of which they are a part.” (page 55)
  • “Should we pay them (taxes to Caesar) or not?”
  • It’s a volatile question.
  • “The spokesmen of the authorities set the trap skillfully. Either answer would get Jesus in trouble.” (page 55) Either he
    • Could be charged with sedition or,
    • He risked discrediting himself with the crowd. “Most likely, this was the primary purpose of the question: to separate Jesus from the crowd by leading him into an unpopular response.” (page 55)
  • As he did with the question about authority, he turns the situation back on his opponents.
  • “Jesus’s strategy has led his questioners to disclose to the crowd that they have a coin with Caesar’s image on it. In this moment, they are discredited.” (page 56)
  • “Thus, even before the famous words about rendering to Caesar, Jesus has won the encounter.” (page 56)
  • “The second half of Jesus’s response is both evocative and provocative: “Give to God the things that are God’s. It raises the question, ‘What belongs to Caesar, and what belongs to God?” (page 56)
  • “What belongs to Caesar? The implication is, nothing.” (page 57)

God Of The Dead Or Of The Living?

  • Mark 12:18-27
  • The Sadducees differed from the “chief priests, elders, and scribes” in two ways:
    • They accepted only the “law,” the five books of Moses called the Torah as sacred scripture.
    • They did not believe in an afterlife. (They did not believe there would be a resurrection of the dead.”
  • The purpose of the resurrection of the dead was to redress human injustice: Jews who were faithful to God were being executed, and Jews who were willing to collaborate with Antiochus were being spared.
  • “If you’re rich and powerful, who needs an afterlife?” (page 58)
  • Levirate marriage: if a man dies before his wife has a child, then the man’s brother shall marry the widow and conceive an heir for the brother who died. (page 58)
  • Does personal identity continue in a life after death, and do our relationships continue?
  • Jesus’s response is threefold
    • He charges the Sadducees with a deficient understanding of scripture and God
    • He addresses the specific question: “When they rise from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven.” (12:25)
      • Borg & Crossan say it is unclear to them what to make of this response.
      • They suggest trying to discern a informative meaning may be a mistake
    • Jesus refers to a passage from the book of Exodus, one of the books the Sadducess did regard as sacred scripture.
      • Exodus 3:6
      • “God is God not of the dead, but of the living. You are quite wrong.” (12:27)
  • “For Jesus, the kingdom of God is not primarily about the dead, but about the living, not primarily about life after death, but about life in this world.” (page 60)

The Great Commandment

  • Mark 12:28-34
  • For the first and only time in this section of Mark, the theme of conflict disappears, and we have a story in which a connection is made between Jesus and an interrogator.
  • “A request to provide a concise summary of what loyalty to God means was not unusual within Judaism, though teachers were not always ready to be brief.” (page 60)
  • The two-fold great commandment — to love God and love our neighbor — is so familiar to us that it has become a Christian cliche. Miss the radical meaning of what Jesus is saying:
    • “To love God above all else means giving to God what belongs to God: our heart, soul, mind, and strength. These belong to God, not Caesar.” (page 61)
    • “To love one’s neighbor as one’s self means to refuse to accept the divisions rendered by the normalcy of civilization.”
  • The scribe repeats what he heard and adds, “This is much more important than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices.”
    • Thus the scribe brings up the contrast that dominates this section of Mark
  • “He is not far from it because he knows its heart, but he is not in it. To be in it means more than knowing this. It means living it.” (page 62)

Jesus Challenges Scribal Teaching And Practice

  • Mark 12:35-44
  • Now (again) Jesus takes the initiative.
  • “How can the scribes say that the Messiah is the son of David?” (page 63)
  • The question challenges the teaching of the scribes that the Messiah is the son of David. But what does this mean?
  • It might be about biological ancestry. It implies that Jesus is not of Davidic descent. This seems unlikely. The tradition that Jesus is a descendant of David is early, such as in Romans 1:3.
  • “Some of Jesus’s contemporaries expected that the Messiah would be ‘son of David’ in the sense of being a king like David — a warrior who presided over Israel in the time of its greatest power and glory.” (page 63)
  • “The message here then is that the Messiah will not be a king like David, not ‘son of David’ in this sense.”
  • “The term ‘son David’ is not so much wrong as inadequate. The point, rather, is that the Messiah is David’s Lord — that is, greater than David, more than David, different from David.” (page 64)
  • Next, Jesus indicts the self-important practice of the scribes. “… and yet, ‘They devour widows’ houses’ (12:40)
    • How do they devour widows’ houses? Most likely this is in reference to the scribes’ activity as working for the wealthy, they would have administered loan agreements and then foreclosed on widows’ property when the loan could not be re-payed.
  • Then we have the passage about the poor widow who puts in the temple treasury “all that she had.”
    • This passage is commonly understood as contrasting the deep devotion of the poor widow with the public display of generosity of the wealthy.
    • “An alternative interpretation hears the passage as a condemnation of the way the poor are manipulated to give all that they have to support the temple.” (page 64)

The Temple’s Destruction And Jesus’s Return

  • Mark 13:1-4
  • Jesus and the disciples are leaving the temple. One of them exclaims, “Look, Teacher, what large stones and what large buildings!” Jesus responds by telling them, “Not one stone will be left here upon another; all will be thrown down.”
  • Like the prophet Jeremiah six centuries earlier, Jesus speaks of the destruction of the temple, and of Jerusalem.
  • “In an important sense, this passage is the climax of the series of conflicts between Jesus and the system of domination and collaboration centered in the temple. The judgement against what it had become pronounced by Jesus’s prophetic act in the temple on Monday is here explicitly articulated.” (page 65)
  • The disciples then ask, “When will this be, and what will be the sign that all these things are about to be accomplished?” (page 65)

The Little Apocalypse

  • Mark 13:5-37
  • An apocalypse — the word means “revelation” or “unveiling” — is a kind of Jewish and Christian literature that reveals or unveils the future in language loaded with images and symbols.
  • This is the longest single speech in Mark’s gospel.
  • “At the center of the little apocalypse is an event described as ‘the desolating sacrilege set up where it ought not to be,’ followed by an aside to the reader, the only such remark in Mark, ‘Let the reader understand.'” (13:14)
  • “Chapter 13 uses this language to speak of an event in Mark’s own time, namely, the conquest and destruction of Jerusalem and the temple by Rome in the year 70.” (page 68)
  • The war began in the year 66 when the greatest of the Jewish revolts against Roman rule broke out.
  • The desolating sacrilege — the destruction of the temple — is not the last word in this chapter. Jesus also speaks of “the coming of the Son of Man.” It also indicates a time, “But in those days, after that suffering,” (page 69)
  • “It refers to a humanlike figure who comes to God and to whom God gives an everlasting kingdom.” (page 69)
  • “To use later Christian language, this seems to be a ‘second coming’ of Jesus text. Mark expected this soon.”
  • “In our judgement, Mark’s gospel expresses an intensification of apocalyptic expectation triggered by the great war.” (page 70)
  • “But beneath Mark’s timetable, one may perceive a deeper meaning in his apocalyptic conviction. Namely, what has begun in Jesus will triumph, despite the tumult and resistance of this world.” (page 70)

“Tuesday has been a long day. By now, it is evening on the Mount of Olives. Darkness is coming on, a darkness that will deepen as the week continues to unfold. And as the darkness falls, Mark commends us, ‘Be alert! Stay awake! Watch!” (page 70)

The Last week: Chapter 2, Monday

Mark 11:12-19

Markan Frames

  • Mark’s gospel often contains pairs of incidents that are intended to be interpreted in light of one another.
  • How exactly do the framing of Incident A and the framed Incident B shed light on one another?
  • An example: Mark 3:20-35
    • Incident A: Mark 3:20-21. Jesus’s birth-family members are rejecting him as insane
    • Incident B starts at Mark 3:22. The Scribes say he casts out demons in the name of Satan.
    • Jesus’s rebuttal in Mark 3:24-25. The rebuttal points toward the framed “kingdom” or domain of Satan and toward the framing “house” or family of Jesus
    • Incident A then picks back up at Mark 3:31-35
    • Mark’s framing technique pushes hearers or readers to meditate deeply on the intercalation of those two dismissals by Jesus. “Think, it says, and keep on thinking.” (page 34)

From The Fig Tree Hear Its Lesson

  • Incident A: Jesus sees a fig tree, doesn’t find figs on it, and pronounces a curse that it would never produce figs again, a curse the disciples hear. 11:12-14
  • Incident B: The temple incident. 11:15-19
  • Incident A conclusion: Jesus’s disciples see that the fig tree has withered away to its roots. 11:20-21
  • Jesus cursing the fig tree is contradictory, and Mark points this out.
    • It was March or April and there could never have been figs on that tree. Mark explicitly says this.
    • On the other hand, Jesus is hungry, expects to find figs, and failing to do so curses the fig tree
  • “The obvious contradiction between these two aspects of the incident is Mark’s way of warning us to take the event symbolically rather than historically.” (page 35)
  • “The framing fig tree warns us that the framed temple is not being cleansed, but symbolically destroyed and that, in both cases, the problem is a lack of the ‘fruit’ that Jesus expected to be present.” (page 35)
  • What exactly is wrong with the temple?

The Meaning Of Blood Sacrifice

  • “Most people in the ancient world took blood sacrifice for granted as a normal or even supreme form of religious piety.” (page 36)
  • Why?
    • In order to eat meat or to have a feast you had to first kill and animal.
    • Long before animal sacrifice was invented, human beings knew two basic ways of creating, maintaining, or restoring good relations with one another — the gift and the meal.
  • Sacrifice as a gift to God, the animal was burned on the altar, totally destroying it.
  • In sacrifice as meal, the animal was transferred to God by having its blood poured over the altar as then returned to the offerer as divine food for a feast with God.
    • “In other words, the offerer did not so much invite God to a meal as God invited the offerer to a meal.” (page 36)
  • Sacrifice: sacrum facere (Latin), “to make” (facere) “sacred” (sacrum)
  • “In a sacrifice the animal is made sacred and is given to God as a sacred gift or returned to the offerer as a sacred meal. That sense of sacrifice should never be confused with either suffering or substitution.” (page 37)
  • “Most Jews accepted blood sacrifice as a normal and normative component of divine worship at the time of Jesus. There is no reason to think that Jesus’s action in the temple was caused by any rejection of blood sacrifice, or indeed, had anything to do with sacrifice as such.” (page 38)

The Ambiguity Of The High-Priesthood

  • “Today some Christian denominations have priests and some do not, but post-Reformation tensions over the clergy either as function or caste should not be retrojected into Jesus’s temple action.” (page 38)
  • The Ambiguous status of the high-priesthood at the time of Jesus
    • Jewish Hasmonean or Maccabean leaders, through successful wards against Syrian imperialism, had elevated their status to that of high priests and kings to become priest-kings. Normally there was a hereditary requirement for candidates for high-priests.
    • Recall how the Romans divided territories of Israel amongst Herod’s children to rule in their place, but they appointed a governor, Pilot, to rule Judea, which contains Jerusalem.
    • There was no longer a single hereditary dynasty that established the next high priest for life; instead there were those four major families competing with one another for appointment to that office.
    • The governor hired and fired the high priest and will.
  • How could a high priest negotiate with a governor who could fire him? It was a recipe for misrule. Hence the collaboration between the high-priest and the Roman governor.
  • “It was possible to be against a particular high priest and the manner in which he was fulfilling his role without being against the office of high priest itself. There was a terrible ambiguity in that the priest who represented the Jews before God on the Day of Atonement also represented them before Rome the rest of the year.” (page 40)

The Ambiguity Of The Temple

  • “That ambiguity of Judaism’s high priest as Rome’s primary local collaborator spilled over to the temple as well. That building was both the house of God on earth and the institutional seat of submission to Rome.” (page 40)
  • After Herod rebuilt the platform of the temple and added the giant Court of the Gentiles, he placed a large golden eagle, symbol of Rome and its supreme divinity, Jupitor Optimus Maximus, at the top of one of its gates.
  • Two Jewish teachers told their students to hack it off the wall since it was contrary to their sacred laws. They were executed, some burnt alive. These martyrs didn’t act against the temple, but against the ambiguity of the Roman eagle on the Jewish temple.
  • This ambiguity went back over half a millenium before Jesus.

Jeremiah And The Temple

  • “In Jeremiah 7 God tells Jeremiah to stand in front of the temple and confront those who enter to worship (7:1). About what? About their false sense of security.” (page 41)
  • “Do you think, charges God through Jeremiah, that divine worship excuses you from divine justice, that all God wants is regular attendance at God’s temple rather than equitable distribution of God’s land?” (page 42)
  • Jeremiah 7:5-7, 11
  • “Den of robbers”: The people’s everyday injustice makes them robbers, and they think the temple is their safe house, den, hideaway, or place of security.” (page 42)
  • “There was an ancient prophetic tradition in which God insisted not just on justice and worship, but justice over worship.” (page 42)
  • “What will happen if worship in the house of God continues as a substitute for justice in the land of God?” (page 43)
  • Shiloh, which was destroyed by the Philistines, was the place were the ark of the covenant was enshrined in the tent of God before it was removed to the temple of God built by Solomon.

Jesus And The Den Of Robbers

  • “The Temple incident involved both an action by Jesus and a teaching that accompanied and presumably explained it.” (page 44)
  • The action, Jesus:
    • began to drive out the buyers and sellers
    • overturned the tables of the money changers
    • overturned the seats of the dove sellers
    • would not allow anyone to carry anything through the temple
    • “It means that Jesus has shut down the temple. But it is a symbolic rather than a literal ‘shutdown.'” (page 45)
    • Recall the Markan frame of the fig tree and the temple set up earlier. (page 45)
      • The tree was “shut down” for lack of the fruit Jesus demanded, and so was the temple.
      • In the case of the temple, it is not a cleansing, but a symbolic destruction, and the fig tree’s fate emphasizes that meaning.
  • The teaching:
    • “Is it not written, ‘My house shall be called a house of prayer for all the nations’? But you have made it a den of robbers.” Mark 11:17
    • Gospel footnotes usually indicate the sources as Isaiah 56:7, for the “house of prayer” part and Jeremiah 7:11 for the “den of robbers” part, but the former is given in quotation marks and the latter is not. In other words “den of robbers” is not indicated clearly as a quotation, and that has caused misunderstanding of Jesus’s action. “Den” is ignored and “robbery” is taken to refer to what is going on in the outer Court of the Gentiles
    • “But clearly from the quotation’s context in Jeremiah 7 and 26, a “den” is a hideaway, a safe house, a refuge. It is not where the robbers rob, but where they flee to for safety after having done their robbing elsewhere.” (page 46)
    • “But God is a God of justice and righteousness and when worship substitutes for justice, God rejects God’s temple — or, for us today, God’s church.” (page 46)

For All the Nations

  • Distinction between what Jesus said and what Mark adds. Borg and Crossan say it’s difficult to imagine the historical Jesus using the Isaiah 56:7 quotation because he was standing in the Court of the Gentiles.
  • “In the year 30 CE, therefore, neither Jesus nor anyone else could stand where the money changers sat and the pure animals were sold and say that the temple was not open to all people, that it was not “a house of prayer for all the nations.” (page 47)
  • Mark is thinking not so much of Jesus around 30 CE as his own people forty years later.
  • Mark is writing sometime after the destruction of Jerusalem and its temple in 70 CE, and explaining to Christian Jews why God allowed it to happen.
  • “Between 67 and 70 the temple was certainly no longer open to ‘all the nations,’ but had become a stronghold for Zealot insurgents, a stronghold initially against their own Jewish aristocracy and eventually against the besieging Roman legions.

Twin Symbolic Actions

  • Sunday’s demonstration occurs at the entrance to Jerusalem, and Monday’s at the entrance of the temple. For market these are not so much two separate incidents as a single double one.
  • The structure of Sunday and Monday’s events are similar. (page 48)
  • Mark 11:11 connects the two events, and it serves to emphasize that it also was a preplanned action.
  • “Taken together, and they must be taken together, those action-word combinations proclaim the already present kingdom of God against both the already present Roman imperial power and the already present Jewish high-priestly collaboration. Jerusalem had to be retaken by a nonviolent messiah rather than by a violent revolution, and the temple ritual had to empower justice rather than excuse one from it. What is involved for Jesus is an absolute criticism not only of violent domination, but of any religious collaboration with it.” (page 49)

The Last Week: Preface and Chapter 1

Preface

  • This book is about the last week of Jesus’s life.
  • “Passion” is from the Latin noun passio, meaning “suffering.”
  • In everyday English we also use “passion” for any consuming interest, dedicated enthusiasm, or concentrated commitment.
  • “In this book we focus on ‘what Jesus was passionate about’ as a way of understanding why his life ended in the passion of Good Friday.” (page 5)
  • “We do not in this book intend to attempt a historical reconstruction of Jesus’s last week on earth.” (page 5)
  • “tell and explain, against the back-ground of Jewish high-priestly collaboration with Roman imperial control, the last week of Jesus’s life on earth as given in the Gospel According to Mark.” (page 5)
  • “Mark alone went out of his way to chronicle Jesus’s last week on a day-by-day basis, while the others kept some but not all of those indications of time.” (page 6)
  • “Christian liturgy has started to collapse Holy Week into its last three days and renamed Palm Sunday as Passion Sunday.” (page 7)
  • “the loss of Palm Sunday’s enthusiastic crowds and all those days and events in between may weaken or even negate the meaning of the death and therefore of that resurrection (page 7)

Chapter 1: Palm Sunday

  • Mark 11:1-11
  • Two processions. One was a peasant procession, the other an imperial procession. The two processions embody the central conflict of the week that led to Jesus’s crucifixion. (page 9)
  • Standard practice of Romain governors of Judea to be in Jerusalem for the major Jewish festivals to be in the city in case there was trouble.
  • “Pilate’s procession displayed not only imperial power, but also Roman imperial theology. According to this theology, the emperor was not simply the ruler of Rome but the Son of God.” (page 10)
  • As Mark tells the story in March 11:1-11, it is a prearranged ‘counterprocession.’ Jesus planned it in advance.
  • “The meaning of the demonstration is clear, for it uses symbolism from the prophet Zechariah (9:9) in the Jewish Bible.” (page 11)
  • “This contrast — between the kingdom of God and the kingdom of Ceasar — is central not only to the gospel of Mark, but to the story of Jesus and early Christianity.” (page 11)
  • Jerusalem
    • By the first century, Jerusalem had been the center of the sacred geography of the Jewish people for a millennium.
    • “It is the city of God and the faithless city, the city of hope and the city of oppression, the city of joy and the city of pain.” (page 12)
    • “Jersualem became the capital of ancient Israel in the time of King David, around 1000 BCE. Under David and his son Solomon, Israel experienced the greatest period in its history.” (page 12)
    • “So revered did David become that the hoped-for future deliverer, the messiah, was expected to be a ‘son of David,’ a new David, indeed greater than David. (page 12)
    • “Within the theology that developed around it (the temple), it was the ‘navel of the earth’ connecting this world to its source in God, and here (and only here) was God’s dwelling place on earth.” (page 12)
    • “The temple mediated not only God’s presence, but also God’s forgiveness. It was the only place of sacrifice, and sacrifices was the means of forgiveness.” (page 12)
    • Beginning in the half century after King David, Jerusalem became the center of a ‘domination system.'” (page 13)
    • Domination system (page 13):
      • 1. Political oppression
      • 2. Economic exploitation
      • 3. Religious legitimation
    • “In this sense ‘domination systems’ are normal, not abnormal, and thus can also be called the ‘normalcy of civilization.'” (page 14)
    • “As the home of the monarchy and aristocracy, of wealth and power, Jerusalem became the center of injustice and betrayal of God’s covenant.” (page 14)
    • “Yet even among the prophets who indicted it so sharply, Jerusalem also retained positive associations as the city of God and the city of hope. Moreover, Jerusalem’s future was not just about itself; rather, it was a hope for the world, God’s dream for the world.
    • “These are images of justice, prosperity, and security. And the creation of this world of justice and peace, in which fear will be no more, will come from the God whose dwelling place is Jerusalem.” (page 16)
  • Jerusalem In The Centuries Before Jesus
    • After a dreadful siege of over a year, Jerusalem was conquered by the Babylonians in 586 BCE. (page 16)
    • After about fifty years in exile, the Jewish people were permitted to return to their homeland. In the late 500s, within a few decades of their return, they rebuilt the temple.
    • For several centuries Judea with its capital in Jerusalem was ruled by foreign empires. (page 17)
    • It fell under the control of Rome in 63 BCE.
    • Rome appointed as king of the Jews a man named Herod, an Idumean whose family had only recently converted to Judiasm. Herod had a long reign, until 4 BCE, and eventually became known to history as Herod the Great.
    • Herod ruled from Jerusalem, and the city became magnificent during his reign. He rebuilt the temple. Beginning in the 20s of the first century BCE, Herold “remodeled” the modest postexilic temple, but in effect built a new temple surrounded by spacious courts and elegant colonnades, with sumptuous use of marble and gold.
    • Though history knows him as “Herod the Great,” he was not popular among many Jews. (page 19)
    • When Herod died in 4 BCE, revolts erupted. They were so serious that Roman legions had to be brought south from Syria to quell them.
  • Jerusalem In The First Century
    • The events of 6 CE significantly changed political circumstances for Jerusalem and the temple (page 19)
    • The temple replaced Herodian rule as the center of the local domination system. The temple was now the enter of local collaboration with Rome.
    • At the top of the system were temple authorities, headed by the high priest, and included members of aristocratic families. Mark called these “the chief priests, the elders, and the scribes.” (For example Mark 14:53)
    • Temple authorities came from wealthy families.
    • “The issue is not their individual virtue or wickedness, but the role they played in the domination system. They shaped it, enforced it, and benefited from it.” (page 22)
    • “Their role was to be the intermediaries between a local domination system and an imperial domination system.” (page 22)
    • “The temple’s role as the center of a domination system was legitimated by theology: its place in the system was said to have been given by God.” (page 23)
    • Jesus was not the only Jewish anti-temple voice in the first century. Among other voices were the Essenes, identified with the community that produced the Dead Sea Scrolls.
    • The Jewish revolt in 66 CE was directed as much against the Jewish collaborators in Jerusalem as it was against Rome itself.
    • Forgiveness was a function that temple theology claimed for itself, mediated by sacrifice in the temple. (page 23)
    • Mark 2:7, “Their point is not that Jesus is claiming to be God. Rather, their point is that God has provided a way to forgive sins — namely through temple sacrifice. And here is Jesus, like John, proclaiming forgiveness apart from the temple.” (page 24)
    • In 70 CE Roman legions shattered the great revolt by reconquering the city and destroying the temple, leaving only the part of the western wall of the temple platform.
    • “The destruction of the temple changed Judaism forever. Sacrifice ceased, the role of the priesthood was eclipsed, and the central institutions of Judaism became scripture and synagogue.” (page 25)
  • Jerusalem In The Gospel of Mark
    • Six of Mark’s sixteen chapters are set in Jerusalem; almost 40 percent of the whole
    • “In Mark, Jesus’s message is not about himself — not about his identity as the Messiah, the Son of god, the Lamb of God, the Light of the World, or any of the other exalted terms familiar to Christians.” (page 25)
    • “In Mark only voices from the Spirit world speak of Jesus’s special identity.”
    • “In response to Jesus’s question to his disciples, ‘Who do people say that I am?’ Peter says, ‘You are the Messiah.’ This is the only time in Mark’s gospel that a follower of Jesus says anything like this. Jesus’s response confirms that this has not been part of Jesus’s own message: “And he sternly ordered them not to tell anyone about him.'” Mark 8:27-30
    • Second occasion, on the night before his execution, during interrogation by the high priest, who asks him, “Are you the Messiah, the Son of the Blessed One?” The response of Jesus is commonly translated “I am.” (Mark 14:61-62).
    • “In Greek, the language in which Mark writes, the phrase is ambiguous. Green does not reverse word order to indicate a question rather than a statement. Thus Jesus’s response, ego eimi, can mean either “I am” or “Am I?” (page 26)
      • The way that Matthew and Luke revise this scene suggests they understood the later mean. Matthew 26:64; Luke 22:70
    • “If Jesus’s message in Mark was not about himself, what was it about? For Mark, it is about the kingdom of God and the way.” (page 26)
    • The Greek word for “way” is hodos and Mark uses it frequently throughout his gospel. Hodos is translated with a number of words: “way,” “road,” “path”
    • “Repent, and believe in the good news.” Mark 1:15
      • Repent has two meanings here:
        • From the Hebrew Bible, it has the meaning of “to return,” especially “to return from exile”
        • The roots of the Greek word for “repent” mean “to go beyond the mind that you have”
    • The word “believe” has a meaning quite different from the common Christian understanding. For Christians, “to believe” often means thinking that a set of statements, a set of doctrines is true. But the ancient meaning of the word “believe” has much more to do with trust and commitment. (page 27)
    • To whom did Jesus direct his message about the kingdom of God and the “way”? Primarily to peasants
      • Why? The most compelling answer is that Jesus saw his message as to and for peasants. (page 28)
    • The two chapters of Mark following Peter’s affirmation that Jesus is the Messiah, leading up to Jesus’s entry in Jerusalem on Palm Sunday are about what it means to follow Jesus, to be a genuine disciple. (page 28)
    • After Peter’s affirmation Jesus for the first time speaks of his destiny. Commonly called “the first prediction of the passion,” it is followed by two more solemn announcements anticipating Jesus’s execution.
    • Each of these anticipations of Jesus’s execution is followed by teaching about what it means to follow Jesus.
    • In first-century Christianity, the cross had a twofold meaning:
      • Execution by the empire
      • By the time of Mark’s gospel it had also become a symbol for the “way” or the “path” of death and resurrection, of entering new life by dying to an old life.
    • To underline the centrality of the chapters that speak to what it means to follow Jesus, Mark frames them with two stories of seeing
    • “The framing is deliberate, the meaning clear: to see means to see that the way involves following Jesus to Jerusalem.” (page 30)
    • “Thus we have the twofold theme that leads to Palm Sunday. Genuine discipleship, following Jesus, means following him to Jerusalem, the place of (1) confrontation with the domination system and (2) death and resurrection. These are the two themes of the week that follows, Holy Week. Indeed, these are the two themes of Lent and of the Christian life.” (page 31)
    • “Which procession are we in? Which procession do we want to be in? This is the question of Palm Sunday and of the week that is about to unfold.” (page 31)

Pastrix Favorite Quotes

Seekers & Skeptics, Hope’s Tuesday night book discussion group, will begin discussing a new book, Pastrix, The Cranky, Beautiful Faith of a Sinner & Saint by Nadia Bolz-Weber on Tuesday, January 7, 2014. Bolz-Weber is pastor of House For All Sinners And Saints, an ELCA mission church in Denver, Colorado, and is a leading voice in the emerging church movement.

Pastrix: The Cranky, Beautiful Faith of a Sinner & Saint Outrageous, rich, and remarkable, PASTRIX turns spiritual memoir on its ear in this sardonically irreverent and beautifully honest page-turner. Nadia Bolz-Weber takes no prisoners as she reclaims the term “pastrix” (pronounced “pas-triks,” a term used by some Christians who refuse to recognize female pastors) in her messy, beautiful, prayer-and-profanity laden narrative about an unconventional life of faith.

Page xvii: The story told in this book is not chronological, but rather thematic. It’s about the development of Nadia’s faith, the expression of her faith, and the community of her faith.

Page xvii: “How the Christian faith, while wildly misrepresented in so much of American culture, is really about death and resurrection.”

Page 9: “here in the midst of my own community of underside dwellers that I couldn’t help but begin to see the Gospel, the life-changing reality that God is not far off, but here among the brokeness of our lives. And having seen it, I couldn’t help but point it out. For reasons I’ll never quite understand, I realized that I had been called to proclaim the Gospel from the place where I am, and proclaim where I am from the Gospel.”

Page 15: “I can’t imagine that the God of the universe is limited to our ideas of God. .. In a way, I need a God who is bigger and more nimble and mysterious than what I could understand and contrive. Otherwise it can feel like I am worshipping nothing more than my own ability to understand the divine.”

“Unlike my feelings toward the Christian fundamentalism from which I would soon part ways, I never stopped valuing the spiritual weirdness of hospitality and community. … I was looking for a community in which all of me would actually fit in.” (Page 26)

“..the connection — the deep, ongoing, and personal connection people like Margery had with God, a power greater than their alcoholic selves — was in no way based on piety or righteousness. It was based solely on something I could related to a hell of a lot more: desperation.” (Page 38)

“God’s grace is not defined as God being forgiving to us even though we sin. Grace is when God is a source of wholeness, which makes up for my failings.” (Page 49)

“If they choose to leave when we don’t meet their expectations, they won’t get to see how the grace of God can come in and fill the holes left by our community’s failure, and that’s just too beautiful and too real to miss.” (Page 54)

“What makes Lutherans blessed is not, as I once thought, that they’re somehow different from the people in the Church of Christ where I was raised. Rather, what makes us all blessed is that, like the landowner in the parable, God comes and gets us, taps us on the shoulder, and says, ‘Pay attention, this is for you.’ Dumb was we are, smart and faithful as we are, just as we are.” (Page 56)

“There’s a popular misconception that religion, Christianity specifically, is about knowing the difference between good and evil so that we can choose the good. But being good has never set me free the way truth has. Knowing all of this makes me love and hate Jesus at the same time. Because, when instead of contrasting good and evil, he contrasted truth and evil, I have to think about all the times I’ve substituted being good (or appearing to be good) for truth.” (Page 72)

“There is simply no knowable answer to the question of why there is suffering. But there is meaning. And for me that meaning ended up being related to Jesus — Emmanuel — which means, “God with us.” We want to go to God for answers, but sometimes what we get is God’s presence.” (Page 86)

“I was, now a pastor of a GLBTQ “inclusive” congregation, and I felt revulsion at seeing an intersex person. It was humbling to say the least. And it made me face, in a very real way, the limitations of inclusion. If the quality of my Christianity lies in my ability to be more inclusive than the next pastor, things get tricky because I will always, always encounter people — intersex people, Republicans, criminals, Ann Coulter, etc. — whom I don’t want in the tent with me. Always. I only really want to be inclusive of some kinds of people and not others.” (Page 90)

“I was reminded again of the loaves and fishes. ‘What do we have?’ they asked. ‘We have nothing. Nothing but a few loaves and a couple of fish.’ And they said this as though it were a bad thing. The disciples’ mistake was also my mistake: They forgot that they have a God who created the universe out of ‘nothing,’ that can put flesh on dry bones ‘nothing,’ that can put life in a dusty womb ‘nothing.’ I mean, let’s face it, ‘nothing’ is God’s favorite material to work with.” (Page 104)

“I think loving our enemies might be too central to the Gospel — to close to the heart of Jesus — for it to wait until we mean it.” (Page 115)

“For far too long, I believed that how the Church of Christ saw me, or how my family saw me, or how society saw me, was the same as how God saw me.” (Page 138)

“Somewhere along the way I was taught that evil is fought through justice and might. … So maybe retaliation or holding on to anger about the harm done to me doesn’t actually combat evil. Maybe it feeds it.” (Page 149)

“Jesus brings a kingdom ruled by the crucified one and populated by the unclean and always found in the unexpected. I’d expected to look at the past and see only mistakes that I’d moved on from, to see only damage and addiction and tragic self-delusion. But by thinking that way, I’d assumed that God was nowhere to be found back then. But that’s kind of an insult to God. It’s like saying, ‘You only exist when I recognize you.'” (Page 162)

There are times when I hear my name, turn, and recognize Jesus. There are times when faith feels like a friendship with God. But there are many other times when it feels more adversarial or even vacant. Yet none of that matters in the end. How we feel about Jesus or how close we feel to God is meaningless next to how God acts upon us.” (Page 176)

“But Russell refused to play along, ‘Yeah, that sucks,’ he said sarcastically. ‘You guys are really good at welcoming the stranger when it’s a young transgender person. But sometimes the stranger looks like your mom and dad.” (Page 184)

“Repentance in Greek means something much closer to ‘thinking differently afterward’ than it does ‘changing your cheating ways.'” (Page 192)

“Repentance, ‘thinking differently afterward,’ is what happens to me when the truth of who I am and the truth of who God is scatter the darkness of competing ideas. And these truths don’t ever feel like they come from inside me.” (Page 193)

“The greatest spiritual practice is just showing up. And Mary Magdelene is the patron saint of just showing up. Showing up, to me, means being present to what is real, what is actually happening.” (Page 197)

“And it was her, a deeply faithful and deeply flawed woman, whom Jesus chose to be the first witness of his resurrection and to whom he commanded to go and tell everyone else about it.” (Page 198)

Pastrix Chapters 16, 17, 18, and 19

Chapter 16: Dirty Fingernails

  • “The notion that our names are spoken by Jesus, and that this is what makes us turn and recognize him, had become important to me, especially in light of how I was called by God.” (Page 167)
  • “He confessed that after nine months at our church he still wasn’t so sure about this Jesus thing. But he knew something real happened in church, especially in the Eucharist.” (Page 168)
  • “The best I could do in that moment was to assure Michael that I didn’t care that he felt like Jesus was ignoring him.” (Page 169)
  • Nadia reminds Michael about how they first met, and what has happened since. (Easter Sunday sermon at Red Rocks)
  • “Easter is not a story about new dresses and flowers and spiffiness. Really, it’s a story about flesh and dirt and bodies and confusion, and it’s about the way God never seems to adhere to our expectations of what a proper God would do (as in not get himself killed in a totally avoidable way.)” (Page 172)
  • “New doesn’t always look perfect. Like the Easter story itself, new is often messy.” (Page 174)
  • “God simply keeps reaching down into the dirt of humanity and resurrecting us from the graves we dig for ourselves through our violence, our lies, our selfishness, our arrogance, and our addictions. And God keeps loving us back to life over and over.” (Page 174)
  • “Lack of connections is death,” he told me as we sat in Hooked on Colfax, nine months after he’d first visited HFASS. “The opposite of that is being able to hug a perfect stranger.” (Page 175)
  • There are times when I hear my name, turn, and recognize Jesus. There are times when faith feels like a friendship with God. But there are many other times when it feels more adversarial or even vacant. Yet none of that matters in the end. How we feel about Jesus or how close we feel to God is meaningless next to how God acts upon us.” (Page 176)

Chapter 17: The Wrong Kind of Different

  • “It was the summer of 2011, and three months earlier a bad thing and a couple of good things had happened” (Page 178)
    • Bad: HFASS was evicted from the church building they had been in for three years
    • Good: Nadia preached at Red Rocks and the Denver Post cover feature, with her picture, had been printed.
      • “This will change everything, I’d thought.” (Page 179)
      • Up to this point HFASS rarely had more than 45 people show up on Sunday
      • “When I dreamed of my church growing, I dreamed of having seventy people at liturgy.” (Page 179)
      • “The very next week after Easter — after the Post and after Red Rocks — our church doubled in size.” (Page 180)
  • “But what we didn’t realize was that they were going to stay, and that they wouldn’t look like us.”
  • “As the weeks progressed during the early summer, I found it increasingly more difficult to muster up a welcoming attitude toward a group of people who, unlike the rest of us, could walk into any mainline protestant church in town and see a room full of people who looked just like them.” (Page 181)
  • “I called a meeting for the church to talk about the ‘sudden growth and demographic changes.'” (Page 182)
  • “For the two weeks prior to the meeting, I had been engaged in a heated emotional battle, but now I felt calm.” (Page 183)
  • “I had lost in what I felt like divine defeat. A few days before the meeting, I underwent what I can only describe as a heart transplant.”
  • “A few days before the meeting, I had called my friend Russell who pastors a church in St. Paul with a similar story and demographic as HFASS.” (Page 184)
  • “But Russell refused to play along, ‘Yeah, that sucks,’ he said sarcastically. ‘You guys are really good at welcoming the stranger when it’s a young transgender person. But sometimes the stranger looks like your mom and dad.” (Page 184)
  • Russell was right.
  • “Then Asher spoke up. ‘As the young transgender kid who was welcomed into this community, I just want to go on the record and say that I’m really glad there are people at church now who look like my mom and dad. Because I have a relationship with them that I just can’t with my own mom and dad.'” (Page 185)
  • “Aaaaand heart transplant healed.” (Page 186)
  • “Out of one corner of your eye there’s a homeless guy serving communion to a corporate lawyer and out of the other corner is a teenage girl with pink hair holding the baby of a suburban soccer mom. And there I was a year ago fearing that the weirdness of our church as going to be diluted.” (Page 187)

Chapter 18: He’s a Fuck-up, But He’s Our Fuck-up

  • “Being conned is up there with throat cancer in terms of things I want to avoid. I had already been had by a Denver pimp and I hardly was up for repeating the experience with a Denver con man. So when Rick Strandlof showed up at church in August of 2011, my first instinct was to try to get rid of him. You know, like Jesus would do.” (Page 191)
  • “Yet the fact that I manage to now move from ‘fuck you’ to something less hostile, and the fact that I am often able to make the move quickly, well, once again, all of it makes be believe in God. And every time, it feels like repentance.” (Page 192)
  • “Repentance in Greek means something much closer to ‘thinking differently afterward’ than it does ‘changing your cheating ways.'” (Page 192)
  • “Repentance, ‘thinking differently afterward,’ is what happens to me when the truth of who I am and the truth of who God is scatter the darkness of competing ideas. And these truths don’t ever feel like they come from inside me.” (Page 193)
  • “the real Rick has a history of childhood neglect, mental illness, and alcohol abuse.” (Page 193)

Chapter 19: Beer & Hymns

  • “Singing vespers in a bar is something even we had never done, but it was July 20, 2012, and nineteen hours earlier and nine miles east of us, a gunman had walked into a midnight showing of a Batman movie and opened fire, killing twelve people and injuring dozens more. Some of our friends had been in that theatre.” (Page 196)
  • “It took a few minutes for me to pinpoint the uniqueness of how these hymns were being sung. But then I knew. It was defiance.” (Page 197)
  • “The greatest spiritual practice is just showing up. And Mary Magdelene is the patron saint of just showing up. Showing up, to me, means being present to what is real, what is actually happening.” (Page 197)
  • “And it was her, a deeply faithful and deeply flawed woman, whom Jesus chose to be the first witness of his resurrection and to whom he commanded to go and tell everyone else about it.” (Page 198)
  • “To sing to God amidst sorrow is to defiantly proclaim, like Mary Magdalene did to the apostles, and like my friend Don did at Dylan Klebold’s funeral, that death is not the final word.” (Page 201)

Next Up: The Last Week

For Lent this year consider engaging your mind as well as your spirit in preparation for Holy Week by reading “The Last Week: What The Gospels Really Teach About Jesus’s Final Days In Jerusalem,” by Marcus Borg and John Dominic Crossan.

Using the gospel of Mark as their guide, Borg and Crossan present a day-by-day account of Jesus’s final week of life. They begin their story on Palm Sunday with two triumphal entries into Jerusalem. The first entry, that of Roman governor Pontius Pilate leading Roman soldiers into the city, symbolized military strength. The second heralded a new kind of moral hero who was praised by the people as he rode in on a humble donkey. The Jesus introduced by Borg and Crossan is this new moral hero, a more dangerous Jesus than the one enshrined in the church’s traditional teachings.

Seekers and Skeptics, Hope’s evening adult book discussion group will begin discussing The Last Week on Tuesday, March 4, and will discuss a chapter each week of Lent. You can join the discussion at 7 PM in the Senior High room of Hope’s education wing. Contact Frank McPherson if you have any questions.

Pastrix Chapters 12, 13, 14 & 15

Chapter 12: The Haitian Stations of the Cross

  • In this chapter Nadia writes about how she learned about the earthquakes in Haiti in January 2012 and how she determine how to lead HFASS’ reaction to it.
  • Nadia’s challenge: what to preach on that Sunday with the assigned text for that day being the Wedding at Cana.
  • “So the week of the earthquake, I started to see Mary in a long line of prophets who have not kept silent.” (Page 127)
  • What liturgical practices do you like? (For example, the stations of the cross)

Chapter 13: Demons and Snow Angels

  • In this chapter Nadia writes about identity, and our identity through baptism
  • “That’s when Paul finally understood grace. Paul finally understood that God’s ability to name and love us is always greater than our ability to make ourselves worthy of either thing.” (Page 134)
  • “Luther read that we are saved by grace and not through our ‘works,’ and when he read that he realized he had been lied to.” (Page 134)
  • Nadia compares Paul and Luther to Asher (Mary Callahan), and notes that at the time of Asher’s naming rite she too was struggling with identity issues. Her feelings of self-worth too heavily tied to the success or failure of HFASS.
  • Nadia is struggling with the sermon for that Sunday, the text for which is Jesus’s baptism, which she associates with identity.
  • “Before we do anything wrong and before we do anything right, God has named and claimed us as God’s own.” (Page 138)
  • “For far too long, I believed that how the Church of Christ saw me, or how my family saw me, or how society saw me, was the same as how God saw me.” (Page 138)
  • “Our identity has nothing to do with how we are perceived by others.”
  • In that sermon Nadia preached about demons.
  • Martin Luther: “I am baptized.” (Page 140)
  • “since the thing I love about baptism is that it is about God’s action upon us and not our decision to ‘choose’ God, I believe that the promises spoken over us in baptism are promises that are for all of humanity.” (Page 140)

Chapter 14: Doormats and Wrinkled Vestments

  • In this chapter Nadia writes about preaching on the tenth anniversary of 9/11
  • Tenth year anniversary of 9/11. “A cheerful, yellow square on which was written: ‘I can’t forgive this. Can you?’ (Page 145)
  • “I find forgiveness to be one of the trickier elements of the Christian faith since it can feel like forgiving something is the same as saying it’s OK.” (Page 145)
  • The lectionary texts for that Sunday were all about forgiveness
  • “Jesus showed up ten years after the most unforgivable, murderous event of my lifetime and started babbling about forgiveness. And this made forgiveness feel less like a concept and more like a crucible.” (Page 147)
  • “Jesus always seems to be pairing God’s forgiveness of us with our forgiveness of others. But why?” (Page 148)
  • “Somewhere along the way I was taught that evil is fought through justice and might. … So maybe retaliation or holding on to anger about the harm done to me doesn’t actually combat evil. Maybe it feeds it.” (Page 149)
  • “What if forgiveness, rather than being a pansy way of saying it’s OK, is actually a way of wielding bolt cutters and snapping the chain that links us?” (Page 150)
  • “What happened on 9/11 was not OK. That’s why I need to forgive. Because I can’t be bound to that kind of evil. Lest it infect the evil in my own heart and metastasize it.” (Page 150)

Chapter 15: Ghosts in the Kingdom of Heaven

  • In this chapter Nadia writes about recognizing the kingdom heaven.
  • “The week Amy Winehouse died, I was trying to come up with a sermon for that Sunday when my ex-boyfriend sent me a Facebook friend request.” (Page 152)
  • The gospel text is a string of parables in Matthew comparing the kingdom of heaven to things like a mustard seed and yeast and searching for fine pearls.
  • “Every commentary and article I read about the parables offered me the same combination of obvious and useless.” (Page 159)
  • In this context of her ex-boyfriend contacting her and preparing her sermon, she learns that Amy Winehouse is dead.
  • “Yet Jesus says that heaven’s kingdom is like shrubs and nets and yeast. … I remembered that yeast was considered impure. … So then I began to consider that maybe the kingdom of heaven is found in the unclean and surprising and even the profane.” (Page 161)
  • “I mistakenly had been thinking that the kingdom of heaven was something I should be able to find an illustration for on this side of my life.” (Page 162)
  • “Jesus brings a kingdom ruled by the crucified one and populated by the unclean and always found in the unexpected. I’d expected to look at the past and see only mistakes that I’d moved on from, to see only damage and addiction and tragic self-delusion. But by thinking that way, I’d assumed that God was nowhere to be found back then. But that’s kind of an insult to God. It’s like saying, ‘You only exist when I recognize you.'” (Page 162)

Pastrix Chapters 9, 10 & 11

Chapter 9: Eunuchs and Hermaphrodites

  • In this chapter Nadia proposes that the story of Philip and the Ethiopian Eunuch in Acts 8:26-40 is the story of the conversion of Philip.
  • In talking about this passage in Acts, Nadia says, “The first gentile convert ended up being a black sexual minority.” (Page 89)
  • “I was always told that the message of this text was that we should tell everyone we meet about Jesus because in doing so we might save them. We might convert them.” (Page 89)
  • Nadia is working on a sermon about this text when she encounters a hermaphrodite at a coffee shop.
  • “I was, now a pastor of a GLBTQ “inclusive” congregation, and I felt revulsion at seeing an intersex person. It was humbling to say the least. And it made me face, in a very real way, the limitations of inclusion. If the quality of my Christianity lies in my ability to be more inclusive than the next pastor, things get tricky because I will always, always encounter people — intersex people, Republicans, criminals, Ann Coulter, etc. — whom I don’t want in the tent with me. Always. I only really want to be inclusive of some kinds of people and not others.” (Page 90)
  • “I began to realize that maybe the story of Philip and the Ethiopian eunuch was really about the conversion — not of the eunuch, but of Philip.” (Page 92)
    • The law strictly forbids a eunuch from entering the temple.
    • The eunuch sought God despite the fact that he had heard there was no love for him there.
    • The only command that we know came from God in this instance was for Philip to go and join.
  • “This desire to learn what the faith is from those who have lived it in the face of being told they are not welcome or worthy is far more than “inclusion.” Actually, inclusion isn’t the right word at all, because it sounds like in our niceness and virtue we are allowing “them” to join “us” — like we are judging another group of people to be worthy of inclusion in a tent that we don’t even own.” (Page 93)
  • “I continually need the stranger, the foreigner, the “other” to show me water in the desert.” (Page 93)
  • “I can only look at the seemingly limited space under the tent and think either it’s my job to change people so they fit or it’s my job to extend the roof so that they fit. Either way, it’s misguided because it’s not my tent. It’s God’s tent.” (Page 93)
  • “So in the story of the conversion of Philip and the eunuch is some hope for the church and maybe society itself.” (Page 95)

Chapter 10: Cotton Candy

  • In this chapter we see Nadia so wrapped up with Rally Day that she is unaware of how the Spirit had healed her hurting back
  • “A quaint tradition in Lutheran churches, Rally Day is an effort to get all the families together after the end of the summer to celebrate the beginning of a new year of Sunday school.” (Page 100)
  • “Having a Rally Day event, complete with a cotton candy machine at a church without children, was just the sort of random thing that started getting House for All Sinners and Saints noticed by the ELCA.” (Page 100)
  • There was:
    • A cotton candy machine
    • Six dozen burgers and buns with all the fixings
    • An industrial-size bag of Doritos
    • A couple of cases of soda
  • And Nadia could barely stand up
  • Twenty six people show up
  • Nobody donates money for the food
  • Nadia was pissed
  • “It sounds crazy, and if someone told me this story I’d assume they were lying or delusional. As Stuart’s big drag queen hands lovingly rubbed my lower back and he sweetly asked God to heal me, the muscles in my back went from being a fist to an open hand. The spasms released.” (Page 103)
  • “But then at two a.m. I was startled awake with what can only be described as a bitch slap from the Holy Spirit. My eyes sprang open and out loud I said, “Oh wow.” The force of the realization hit me: My back didn’t hurt. It hadn’t hurt after they prayed for me and it didn’t hurt now as I laid in my bed, startled awake.” (Page 104)
  • Nadia also recalls all of the unexpected outcomes that had occurred during that Rally Day.
  • “I was reminded again of the loaves and fishes. ‘What do we have?’ they asked. ‘We have nothing. Nothing but a few loaves and a couple of fish.’ And they said this as though it were a bad thing. The disciples’ mistake was also my mistake: They forgot that they have a God who created the universe out of ‘nothing,’ that can put flesh on dry bones ‘nothing,’ that can put life in a dusty womb ‘nothing.’ I mean, let’s face it, ‘nothing’ is God’s favorite material to work with.” (Page 104)
  • “People at my table didn’t ask me questions about how they could do HFASS-type stuff at their churches. Instead, they told their own failure stories. With heart and humor I was regaled with tales of badly handled firings and church secretaries with drinking problems and Vacation Bible School nepotism, and I realized that sometimes the best thing we can do for each other is talk honestly about being wrong.” (Page 107)

Chapter 11: Pirate Christian

  • In this chapter Nadia writes about learning to love her enemy
  • “Chris, under the name of Pirate Christian, has a large public following as a heresy hunter. His Pirate Christian Internet radio show broadcast attacks all kinds of Christians who depart even slightly from his own understanding of the faith.” (Page 108)
  • “My liberalness and femaleness and gay-lovingness made me easy plunder for the Pirate.” (Page 109)
  • “Ego and anger often compete for stage time in my head, and inevitably anger cannot be kept under the curtain for long.” (Page 110)
  • Nadia writes about her meeting Chris, the Pirate Christian in a receiving line at a conference.
  • “It’s weird Nadia,” he said. “We obviously disagree about a lot, but something tells me that out of all these liberal Christians, you and I have a couple things we might agree on.” (Page 111)
  • “I looked him in the eye and said, “Chris, I have two things to say to you. One, you are a beautiful child of God. Two, I think that maybe you and I are desperate enough to hear the Gospel that we can even hear it from each other.” (Page 112)
  • “When these kinds of things happen in my life, things that are so clearly filled with more beauty or redemption or reconciliation than my cranky personality and stony heart could ever manufacture on their own, I just have no other explanation than this: God.” (Page 112)
  • Love your neighbor and hate your enemies is not in the Old Testament
  • “‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy’ sounds so familiar.. I’m pretty sure it’s in my heart. It’s link in my DNA.” (Page 114)
  • “I think loving our enemies might be too central to the Gospel — to close to the heart of Jesus — for it to wait until we mean it.” (Page 115)
  • Nadia then goes on the write about being “attacked” by liberal Christians because she supported Sojourners magazine’s decision to not sell ad space to Believe Out Loud.
  • “I may have gotten an ego boost from being attacked by a conservative heresy hunter, but it felt awful to be attacked by my own people.” (Page 118)
  • She then describes getting a phone call of support from Chris. “Chris said that he loved me and would pray for me. His enemy.” (Page 119)

Pastrix Chapters 6, 7 & 8

Chapter 6: Hurricanes and Humiliation

  • In this chapter Nadia writes about how she was conned, willingly and unwillingly
  • “I had rescued a pregnant, disadvantaged, teenaged African American girl… and I was about to give them a new life. This was a white privileged liberal’s dream, and I was riding high on it.” (Page 59)
  • “Still, of all the betrayals in that circumstance, it was my betrayal of myself that stung the most.” (Page 66)
  • “Jesus calls us to welcome the stranger and serve our neighbor. … Who is that neighbor? Being Christian is much harder than I wish it was.” (Page 67)
  • “I’m haunted by how much my love was based on my need to be seen as heroic, and yet I can’t deny that it did feel like love. A better Christian would love her anyway and still want to help her. A lousy Christian is conflicted and maybe a little hurt.” (Page 67)
  • “God uses our humiliations as much as our victories.”

Chapter 7: I Didn’t Call You for This Truth Bullshit

  • In this chapter Nadia writes about a friendship with Candace that does not work out
  • “We met in an alcohol recovery meeting a few years earlier and became friends based purely on the unlikely number of things we had in common.” (Page 70)
  • “Being a loyal friend is something I haven’t always been good at, so at the time, I was trying to make up for my past dis-loyalties by being (or just making it look like I was) selfless.” (Page 71)
  • Nadia writes about a conversation with her sister after visiting Candace in which her sister says, “you have a limited amount of time and emotional energy in your life, and you are squandering tons of it on this one situation just so you can maintain the idea you like to have of yourself as being a loyal friend.” Nadia responds..”I didn’t call you for this truth bullshit.” (Page 71)
  • “There’s a popular misconception that religion, Christianity specifically, is about knowing the difference between good and evil so that we can choose the good. But being good has never set me free the way truth has. Knowing all of this makes me love and hate Jesus at the same time. Because, when instead of contrasting good and evil, he contrasted truth and evil, I have to think about all the times I’ve substituted being good (or appearing to be good) for truth.” (Page 72)
  • “The truth does crush us, but the instant it crushes us, it somehow puts us back together into something honest. It’s death and resurrection every time it happens. This, to me, is the point of confession and absolution in the liturgy.” (Page 73)
  • Writing about the first time she experienced absolution in liturgy she says she thought it was hogwash. “Why should I care if someone says to me that some God I may or may not really believe in has erased the check marks against me for things I may or may not even think are so-called sins? This obviously is the problem with religion for so many: It makes you feel bad enough that you will need the religion to help you feel good again.” (Page 73)
  • Then she says absolution in liturgy came to mean everything to her. “It gradually began to feel like a moment when truth was spoken, perhaps for the only time all week, and it would crush me and then put me back together.” (Page 73)
  • In talking about the last time she meet with Candace and not being able to tell the truth. “I wish I could say that I had learned how powerful the truth is and that I am unwavering in my commitment to it. But in that moment I couldn’t manage to be good or tell the truth. Instead, I said that I had the friends that I needed. Sometimes we can’t manage to choose the truth or to be good, and in those moments I just hope God comes and does that thing where something is transformed into healing anyway.” (Page 76)

Chapter 8: Clinical Pastoral Education

  • In this chapter Nadia writes about her experience as a hospital chaplain
  • During her first experience in a trauma room she asked a nurse what her job was, and the response was “Your job is to be aware of God’s presence in the room while we do our jobs.” (Page 80)
  • “It wasn’t long before I found myself sensing God’s presence in other rooms, too.” (Page 81)
  • “I was the chaplain, but I didn’t have answers for anyone.” (Page 82)
  • She writes about her emotions of dealing with two young boys who just lost their mother. “You hear a lot of nonsense in hospitals and funeral homes. .. But this is the nonsense spawned from bad religion. And usually when you are grieving and someone says something so senselessly optimistic to you, it’s about them” (Page 83)
  • She writes about reading Marcus Borg’s “Meeting Jesus Again for the First Time.” “This was the bonus to liberal Christianity: I could use my reason and believe at the same time. But it only worked for me for a short while. And soon I wanted to experiment with the harder stuff. Admiring Jesus, while a noble pursuit, doesn’t show me where God is to be found when we suffer the death of a loved one or a terrifying cancer diagnosis or when our child is hurt. Admiring and trying to imitate a guy [Jesus] who was really in touch with God just doesn’t seem to bridge the distance between me and the Almighty in ways that help me understand where the hell God is when we are suffering.” (Page 74)
  • Nadia then writes about the image of God she was raised to believe and writes, “this type of thinking portrays God as just as mean and selfish as we are, which feels like it has a lot more to do with our own greed and spite than it has to do with God.” (Page 84)
  • She then writes about being at Good Friday service, which was three days after the accident involving the two young boy and hearing the passion story in John’s Gospel with changed ears. “I listened with the ears of someone who didn’t just admire and want to imitate Jesus, but had felt him present in the room where two motherless boys played on the floor.” (Page 85)
  • “I realized that in Jesus, God had come to dwell with us and share our human story. Even the parts of our human story that are the most painful. … Maybe the Good Friday story is about how God would rather die than be in our sin-accounting business anymore.” (Page 85)
  • “There is simply no knowable answer to the question of why there is suffering. But there is meaning. And for me that meaning ended up being related to Jesus — Emmanuel — which means, “God with us.” We want to go to God for answers, but sometimes what we get is God’s presence.” (Page 86)

Pastrix Chapters 3, 4 & 5

Chapter 3: Albion Babylon

  • In this chapter Nadia writes about being part of a community.
  • “Church, for all its faults, was the only place outside my own home were people didn’t gawk at me or make fun of me.” (Page 23)
  • “Which is why it sucked that there were other reasons I’d eventually not fit in.” (Page 23)
  • “Belonging to the Church of Christ — and therefore, being a Christian — mostly meant being really good at not doing things. … The better you were at not doing these things, the better a Christian you were.” (Page 23)
  • “..the Church of Christ I was raised in was a community. As churchgoers, our lives were shared.” (Page 26)
  • “Unlike my feelings toward the Christian fundamentalism from which I would soon part ways, I never stopped valuing the spiritual weirdness of hospitality and community. … I was looking for a community in which all of me would actually fit in.” (Page 26)
  • Nadia writes about sneaking off to a nearby Quaker meeting, and notes, “Still, although the Quakers were a community, I wasn’t really part of it. I was more of a spectator.” (Page 28)
  • “This experience (living at Albion Babylon) taught me that a community based on the idea that everyone hates rules is, in the end, just as disappointing and oppressive as a community based on the ability to follow rules.” (Page 29)

Chapter 4: La Femme Nadia

  • In this chapter Nadia writes about how she believes God “plunked her down” on a different path, and allowed not to die in exchange for working for God.
  • Have you watched Le Femme Nikita?
  • “When you can’t control something — like how if I take one drink all bets are off no matter what motivation I have for controlling myself — it’s easier to arrange life in which it looks like you’ve chosen it all, as opposed to facing the truth: You have lost your ability to choose any of it.” (page 36)
  • “I was still looking for an affirmation that I wasn’t an alcoholic, so that, dear Jesus, I could go drink again.”
  • “And these people talked about God a lot. But never about an angry God who judged or condemned or was always disappointed in people. The God they spoke of was not the God I was taught to fear.” (Page 36)
  • “Her relationship to God wasn’t doctrinal. It was functional.” (Page 36)
  • “..I was sitting in a twelve-step meeting in an upstairs Masonic lodge when someone shared about something he had rad in the Bible that week that really spoke to his sobriety. I stood up and walked out. The Bible had been the weapon of choice in the spiritual gladiatorial arena of my youth.” (Page 37)
  • “..the connection — the deep, ongoing, and personal connection people like Margery had with God, a power greater than their alcoholic selves — was in no way based on piety or righteousness. It was based solely on something I could related to a hell of a lot more: desperation.” (Page 38)
  • “Getting sober never felt like I had pulled myself up by my own spiritual bootstraps. It felt instead like I was on one path toward self-destruction and God pulled me off of it by the scruff of my collar, me hopelessly kicking and flailing and saying, ‘Screw you, I’ll take the destruction please.'” (Page 40)

Chapter 5: Thanks, ELCA!

  • In which Nadia sums up Lutheran theology in one chapter at less than the cost of a Lutheran seminary education.
  • “At the time I didn’t know it would take more to escape black-and-white thinking than just no longer attending your parent’s church. The church had provided me a sorting system, which was now ingrained. (Page 43)
  • Nadia writes about her first date with her future husband. He says, “Well, my heart for social justice is rooted in my Christian faith.” Nadia responds, “Um, what? I just stared at him saying nothing.” (Page 43)
  • “I soon learned that there were actually a whole world of Christians who take Matthew 25 seriously.” (Page 44)
  • “I had never experienced liturgy before. But here the congregation said things together during the service. And they did stuff: stood, sat, knelt, crossed themselves, went up to the altar for communion, like choreographed sacredness.” (Page 45)
  • “Something about the liturgy was simultaneously destabilizing and centering: my individualism subverted by being joined to other people through God to find who I was. Somehow it happened through God. One specific, divine force. (Page 46)
  • “Most of what I had been taught by Christian clergy was that I was created by God, but was bad because of something some chick did in the Garden of Eden, and that I should try really hard to be good so that God, who is an angry bastard, won’t punish me. Grace had nothing to do with it. I hadn’t learned about grace from the church.” (Page 47)
  • On page 48 she writes what Pastor Ross taught her about grace.
  • “God’s grace is not defined as God being forgiving to us even though we sin. Grace is when God is a source of wholeness, which makes up for my failings.” (Page 49)
  • Nadia then writes about learning how Pastor Ross was removed from the official clergy roster of the ELCA, and how this made her feel: “It feels like the rug of hope that the church might actually be something beautiful and redemptive was pulled out from under me.” (Page 51)
  • Pastor Ross responds: “God is still at work redeeming us and making all things new even in the midst of broken people and broken systems and that, despite any idealism otherwise, it had always been that way.” (Page 51)
  • Her husband Matthew says, “There’s not enough wrong with it to leave and there’s just enough wrong with it to stay…. Fight to change it.” (Page 52)
  • “Every human community will disappoint us, regardless of how well-intentioned or inclusive. But I am totally idealistic about God’s redeeming work in my life and in the world.” (Page 54)
  • “If they choose to leave when we don’t meet their expectations, they won’t get to see how the grace of God can come in and fill the holes left by our community’s failure, and that’s just too beautiful and too real to miss.” (Page 54)
  • “What makes Lutherans blessed is not, as I once thought, that they’re somehow different from the people in the Church of Christ where I was raised. Rather, what makes us all blessed is that, like the landowner in the parable, God comes and gets us, taps us on the shoulder, and says, ‘Pay attention, this is for you.’ Dumb was we are, smart and faithful as we are, just as we are.” (Page 56)